From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Jul 21 8:48:53 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F68814D7C for ; Wed, 21 Jul 1999 08:48:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id RAA48201; Wed, 21 Jul 1999 17:48:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des) To: Doug Cc: Mitch Collinsworth , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, mkc@broccoli.graphics.cornell.edu Subject: Re: bin/12349: 3.2-R inetd doesn't re-read ALL configuration info at HUP signal References: <199907211445.AA031878326@broccoli.graphics.cornell.edu> <3795E8D5.CEABD4C4@gorean.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 21 Jul 1999 17:48:25 +0200 In-Reply-To: Doug's message of "Wed, 21 Jul 1999 08:35:49 -0700" Message-ID: Lines: 17 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Doug writes: > As far as I can see, you're talking about something other than the problem > with inetd not re-reading its conf file when -hup'ed here. Correct. We're talking about running processes not noticing that NIS lines have been added to the password file if there weren't any when they started. > To my knowledge > *that* bug was fixed recently in both current and stable. Yup. As far as I know this was a wrapping-specific problem (or it was introduced when libwrap was imported into the tree). DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message