From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 4 17:59:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D7A16A420 for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 17:59:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mcdouga9@daemon.egr.msu.edu) Received: from daemon.egr.msu.edu (daemon.egr.msu.edu [35.9.44.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C896D43D46 for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 17:59:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mcdouga9@daemon.egr.msu.edu) Received: by daemon.egr.msu.edu (Postfix, from userid 21281) id 258591CC54; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 13:00:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 13:00:15 -0500 From: Adam McDougall To: Max Laier Message-ID: <20060304180014.GB63144@egr.msu.edu> References: <20060304142802.GA63144@egr.msu.edu> <4409A975.1080108@thedarkside.nl> <200603041602.42599.max@love2party.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200603041602.42599.max@love2party.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Pieter de Boer Subject: Re: PR kern/93849 IP checksum broken by pf no-df over bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 17:59:57 -0000 On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 04:02:26PM +0100, Max Laier wrote: On Saturday 04 March 2006 15:51, Pieter de Boer wrote: > Adam McDougall wrote: > > Could someone possibly take a look at this and let me know if it > > looks 'broken' or if I might be doing something wrong? I am in > > a crunch to choose a firewall solution within a few weeks and it > > would help me to know if this issue can be solved. FreeBSD/pf > > seemed an appropriate solution so far, especially since it has > > CARP, pfsync, (and altq which im not using (yet?)). > > You could try compiling pf using CFLAGS=-O instead of -O2. This fixed a > checksum problem I had. That probably was an entirely different issue, > but perhaps it does help.. Can you try this patch and report back instead. Thanks and sorry for the delay. Other than the double (( causing a compile error, it works! Thanks. I verified that the DF bit is clear on the other side and that the checksum changed, and is correct.