Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:14:58 +0800 From: wsk <wsk@gddsn.org.cn> To: net@freebsd.org Subject: ipnat port redirection can't through 2 subnetworks?? Message-ID: <42CCE482.4050904@gddsn.org.cn>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi,folks:
here's my network's layout:
|
|
em0 (160.79.174.99/29)
GateWay (FreeBSD 5.x ipf/ipnat, gateway_enabled)
em1 (192.168.1.1/25)
|
|
em0 (192.168.1.126/25) -- Bridge -- em1 (192.168.1.254/25)
| |
| |
LAN1 LAN2
| |
+---------------------+ +---------+---------+
| | | | |
hostA(192.168.1.2/25) ... hostB(192.168.1.250/25)
WEB Server Mail Server
and here's the ipnat.rules on my gateway box
map em0 192.168.1.0/24 -> 160.79.174.99/32 portmap tcp/udp 10000:60000
map em0 192.168.1.0/24 -> 160.79.174.99/32
rdr em0 160.79.174.99/32 port 80 -> 192.168.1.2 port 80
rdr em0 160.79.174.99/32 port 25 -> 192.168.1.250 port 25
now the problems is that the NAT work fine but the port redirection does not
work on IPNAT and PF.and I found that the port redirection just could work
on the same subnetworks(the rdr could forwarding the port to Bridge box but not
WEB Server or Mail Server).so I wondered could I setup the rdr rules to make it
forwarding ports to my LAN1 or LAN2's hosts ?? :-( thanks any reply with appreciates!!
LAN1's defaultroute is 192.168.1.126
LAN2's defaultroute is 192.168.1.254
Bridge defaultroute is 192.168.1.1
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42CCE482.4050904>