From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Aug 17 23:19:17 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA05587 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Mon, 17 Aug 1998 23:19:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rich.chel.su (mobil.surnet.ru [195.54.2.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA05583 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 1998 23:19:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andy@icc.surw.chel.su) Received: from icc.surw.chel.su (surw.chel.su [195.54.2.162]) by rich.chel.su (8.7.2/Murphy) with ESMTP id MAA23586 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 1998 12:19:49 +0600 (UDT) Received: (from andy@localhost) by icc.surw.chel.su (8.8.5/8.8.4) id KAA01752 for ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 18 Aug 1998 10:22:10 +0400 (MSD) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 10:22:10 +0400 (MSD) From: Andrey Zakhvatov Message-Id: <199808180622.KAA01752@icc.surw.chel.su> To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: /usr/X11R6 vs /usr/local Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello! I've made some ports for X and for non-X environment. With every new port I follow this rules: 1) If application (or library such as GTK) created for working under X (and use X libraries), it must be under /usr/X11R6 (${X11BASE}) 2) Else it must be under /usr/local. Please, say me, am I right or wrong? If right, why not convert some ports to ${X11BASE} layout and follow this rules more strictly? (I mean, for example, KDE). If wrong, we _must_ clear /usr/X11R6 from non-original-X-staff, yes? Sincerely yours, Andy. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message