Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 04:00:43 +0200 From: Folkert Saathoff <folkert@feedface.com> To: snap-users@kame.net, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6 and DUMMYNET traffic shaping Message-ID: <A1599609-2BE3-4823-B475-4AB20C66F9D1@feedface.com> In-Reply-To: <20050927175225.GD29415@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <F4A9DCEA-BB99-4760-9A66-C320EC11F68E@feedface.com> <20050927175225.GD29415@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 07:00:23PM +0200, Folkert Saathoff wrote:
> Hello lists,
>
> in order to evaluate the latency penalty induced by mobile IPv6,
> i need some way to simulate different latencies between two nodes
> in a laboratory environment.
>
> Is it possible at the moment to shape IPv6 traffic with KAME SNAP
> 20050919
> and FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE?
>
> If not, is there some other way to enforce latencies on an interface?
>
further testing revealed that it is in fact possible to enforce latency
on an ipv6-only interface with ipfw and dummynet:
sudo sysctl net.link.ether.ipfw=1
sudo ipfw pipe 1 config bw 100kbit/s
sudo ipfw add 1 pipe 1 layer2 xmit rl1
thnx for the replies :)
/folkert
/*
_
_
*
_||
_
*
||
folkert@feedface.com *
*/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFDOflOIA10xPlRIZURApfsAJ9zBrNd3s7LJTNaR1SqWX9yKZhhyACfa4HZ
JIRP9du59vNOedyZmyijmSg=
=Zxkd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A1599609-2BE3-4823-B475-4AB20C66F9D1>