From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 13 20:15:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF11E51 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:15:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D958FC0C for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TYMtN-000795-Mn for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:15:29 -0800 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:15:29 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1352837729700-5760700.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Simple check if current is broken MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:15:31 -0000 What about cases when something is broken, but not for everybody? If only GENERIC build, how does that differ from existing tinderboxing? -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Simple-check-if-current-is-broken-tp5760481p5760700.html Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabble.com.