From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Nov 13 07:13:15 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id HAA21997
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 07:13:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from brasil.moneng.mei.com (brasil.moneng.mei.com [151.186.109.160])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA21966
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 07:13:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by brasil.moneng.mei.com (8.7.Beta.1/8.7.Beta.1) id JAA23232; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 09:11:19 -0600
From: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
Message-Id: <199611131511.JAA23232@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
Subject: Re: Programming technique for non-forking servers?
To: michaelh@cet.co.jp (Michael Hancock)
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 09:11:19 -0600 (CST)
Cc: stesin@gu.net, hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.95.961113230137.14783D-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> from "Michael Hancock" at Nov 13, 96 11:05:25 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> [cc:Trimmed]
> 
> Is forking on FreeBSD all that bad?

If it results in additional large servers and IPC to coordinate information,
yes.

Not all applications are like that, but some are.

... JG