From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep  4 21:02:02 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E29910656B8
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Sat,  4 Sep 2010 21:02:02 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from prvs=18630f88c7=killing@multiplay.co.uk)
Received: from mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D6178FC17
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Sat,  4 Sep 2010 21:02:01 +0000 (UTC)
X-MDAV-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Sat, 04 Sep 2010 22:01:56 +0100
X-Spam-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Sat, 04 Sep 2010 22:01:56 +0100
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
	mail1.multiplay.co.uk
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=6.0 tests=USER_IN_WHITELIST
	shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5
Received: from r2d2 by mail1.multiplay.co.uk (MDaemon PRO v10.0.4)
	with ESMTP id md50011183041.msg
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 22:01:56 +0100
X-Authenticated-Sender: Killing@multiplay.co.uk
X-MDRemoteIP: 188.220.16.49
X-Return-Path: prvs=18630f88c7=killing@multiplay.co.uk
X-Envelope-From: killing@multiplay.co.uk
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <7EA7AD058C0143B2BF2471CC121C1687@multiplay.co.uk>
From: "Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
To: "jhell" <jhell@DataIX.net>,
	"Artem Belevich" <fbsdlist@src.cx>
References: <5DB6E7C798E44D33A05673F4B773405E@multiplay.co.uk>
	<AANLkTi=6bta-Obrh2ejLCHENEbhV5stbMsvfek3Ki4ba@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C825D65.3040004@DataIX.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 22:01:57 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: zfs very poor performance compared to ufs due to lack of cache?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:02:02 -0000


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "jhell" <jhell@DataIX.net>
> 
> Attached is the needfree patch mentioned in the URL alongside a local
> system patch to adjust kern.maxusers to no more than 512 on systems that
> can support it...

Thanks, patches applied, will update once I've had chance to test.

    Regards
    Steve

================================================
This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. 

In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337
or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.