From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 8 14:46:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1A716A4CE; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 14:46:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rhid.com (rhid.com [200.46.204.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF4043D54; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 14:46:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flaw@rhid.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (rhid.com [200.46.204.134]) by rhid.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C260F84A92; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 15:46:34 +0100 (BST) From: James William Pye To: Garrett Wollman In-Reply-To: <200409071845.i87IjAu6099894@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> References: <1094566670.80264.78.camel@localhost> <20040907163809.M20166@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <200409071845.i87IjAu6099894@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-C3Rs4GaqaPQBXMcT6gI1" Organization: rhid development Message-Id: <1094654804.85018.94.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 07:46:44 -0700 cc: Dan Nelson cc: FreeBSD Standards Subject: Re: /bin/test asdf -ge 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 14:46:46 -0000 --=-C3Rs4GaqaPQBXMcT6gI1 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 11:45, Garrett Wollman wrote: > I agree. I believe that an interpretation request would receive the > "the standard is silent and no conformance distinction can be made" > (and therefore FreeBSD's implementation is not incorrect). It's > instructive to contrast the description of expr(1), where the standard > makes it very clear what constitutes a number. I think that you are likely to be correct here. Perhaps I will send a clarification request noting the constrast you mentioned between test(1) and expr(1) to the OpenGroup list Harti referred to. I think I will also mention arithmetic expansion, as I think the issue exists there as well. --=20 Regards, James William Pye --=-C3Rs4GaqaPQBXMcT6gI1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iQEVAwUAQT8bVKZpiPNPvu8yAQJe/wf9E/sino/JDLCE8hFVDtoK2VGEuiV6dYxw OkCP/kwEbjVnMTRsmeQkMq6g2IDnndx4S2QZzANTEQnKtAKFpyYAj9yH8Dixgo5C RCnlbrr3awMAKiYaZVoQERBlUpiSohENzOf5qVGDTdpeSFP7f+wVQMgAj0VUWL4k RuDjXfJm8zqlre11S9G+tnKXuGt5d+yg7X5FQdZaKHqx+2vG62zS8X1K+PXT1Ltc JMscCe9xq972wHAOPx4j06T50oGVnqQXm07Owg/bZhG9DOTLGbuw6UDV4xxhMLYM VMFIo1HIWkSV+4zqUZjFwFsEALAQxU2eYnaKf+CCWIzuo078loPUdQ== =8xdA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-C3Rs4GaqaPQBXMcT6gI1--