From owner-freebsd-current Wed Apr 21 11:19: 6 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from cc01du.unity.ncsu.edu (cc01du.unity.ncsu.edu [152.1.2.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242EC15832 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 1999 11:15:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rdkeys@unity.ncsu.edu) Received: (from rdkeys@localhost) by cc01du.unity.ncsu.edu (8.8.4/UC02Jan97) id OAA09041; Wed, 21 Apr 1999 14:12:45 -0400 (EDT) From: rdkeys@unity.ncsu.edu Message-Id: <199904211812.OAA09041@cc01du.unity.ncsu.edu> Subject: Re: solid NFS patch #6 avail for -current - need testers files) To: peter@netplex.com.au (Peter Wemm) Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 14:12:45 -0400 (EDT) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <19990421174502.ECEC61F2A@spinner.netplex.com.au> from "Peter Wemm" at Apr 22, 99 01:45:01 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24/POP] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Matthew Reimer wrote: > > Great work guys! It almost seems that -current is more stable than > > -stable! > > Matt > > Funny you should mention it. I've heard this from a number of people over > the last week.. One has even suggested using a particular known-good 4.0 > snapshot in preference to a 3.1-stable for a production system...... > > Cheers, > -Peter Are there any particularly good snapshots one should try? I have a couple of spare boxes on the home net that I am willing to try or crash, for the fun of it. I was using the snap from about 3 weeks back on my home web server and it seems rock solid, but I am running rather plain hardware. Bob Keys To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message