Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:11:45 +0800 From: Rong-En Fan <rafan@freebsd.org> To: Rong-En Fan <rafan@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Update on X11BASE status Message-ID: <20061211111145.GA99582@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> In-Reply-To: <20061203132840.GA2517@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> References: <20061203022926.GA9253@xor.obsecurity.org> <20061203132840.GA2517@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 09:28:40PM +0800, Rong-En Fan wrote: > > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-exp-latest/index-mainta= iner.html > >=20 > > We're now down to fewer than 110 ports that need to be corrected to > > deal with a non-standard X11BASE location (the rest are more general > > port problems). By now only 17 of those broken ports are > > unmaintained, so the majority of them are waiting on individual > > maintainers to step up and/or approve fixes already submitted by other > > users. >=20 > One major problem I encountered so far is math/vtk* and > science/paraview. They all uses CMake system (devel/cmake). >=20 > I'm not quite sure what's the best way to make its makefile accepts > correct X11BASE. One possibility is to patch its FindX11 module, but > it seems to me that these ports contain their CMake/ in their > distribution, i.e., we need to patch each ports. >=20 > Any cmake experts? I fixed cmake yesterday. Now vtk* ports should be just fine. Regards, Rong-En Fan --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFfTzw144QkYb9jGgRAgM/AJoCaIGYK1XYDRFAZBY6Gaf8DREkLACfVFZm v0uxlux4OPp/GjavyzQiDPQ= =s3yz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061211111145.GA99582>