From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 7 08:33:21 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826A016A41B; Sun, 7 Oct 2007 08:33:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from webaccess-cl.virtdom.com (webaccess-cl.virtdom.com [216.240.101.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D224F13C494; Sun, 7 Oct 2007 08:33:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (c-67-160-44-208.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.160.44.208]) (authenticated bits=0) by webaccess-cl.virtdom.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l978X8iE028158 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 7 Oct 2007 04:33:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 01:35:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeff Roberson X-X-Sender: jroberson@10.0.0.1 To: Marc Fonvieille In-Reply-To: <20071007012049.S912@10.0.0.1> Message-ID: <20071007013342.D912@10.0.0.1> References: <20071002165007.D587@10.0.0.1> <20071006074429.GB976@gothic.blackend.org> <20071006102113.GC976@gothic.blackend.org> <47077951.5030906@clearchain.com> <4707866F.7030605@FreeBSD.org> <20071006143141.GD976@gothic.blackend.org> <4707CF8D.3070303@u.washington.edu> <20071006191014.GB84780@abigail.blackend.org> <20071007012049.S912@10.0.0.1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Garrett Cooper , Benjamin Close , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE/yielding patch for testing. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 08:33:21 -0000 On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Sat, 6 Oct 2007, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 11:10:21AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>> >>> Your problem is most likely Flash/Javascript based (I'm basing my >>> theory on the fact that there's a lot of Ajax related stuff on the site). >>> >>> No matter what OS you have, if a website's slow (and it's not >>> because you don't have OpenGL support in your X-server), slowness will >>> remain constant. It's just the way unfortunately that browsers are >>> designed. >>> >> [...] >> >> Not really when the slowness does not exist with 6.X. > > I have experienced certain websites causing firefox to slow down > considerably. When I mouse over firefox the mouse begins to jerk as well but > when I move back away from firefox it seems fine again. I suspected it was > an x/firefox bug. Actually I double-checked this case with dailytech.com. It seems to be spending all of the cpu time in user-space in xwindows. So it seems that it is the new xwindows that has the problem. If you watch the 'TIME' field of top you can see that very little cpu time is attributed to firefox and quite a lot to X windows. So the windowing system is too busy to redraw mouse events even if we are scheduling it well. Jeff > > Although I also sometimes observe mysql hanging for a period of a half second > or so while running sysbench. I wonder if we don't have a threading library > bug? I know I observed this prior to the thread_lock work so hopefully I > didn't break it. > > Jeff > >> >> -- >> Marc >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >