From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Jul 7 9:38:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 189D437BC92 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 09:38:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (robert@fledge.pr.watson.org [192.0.2.3]) by fledge.watson.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA67856; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 12:38:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 12:38:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Dan Nelson Cc: Assar Westerlund , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Procedure for introducing new errno values? In-Reply-To: <20000513224341.B5564@dan.emsphone.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 13 May 2000, Dan Nelson wrote: > Don't forget the errno mappings for the Linux/iBSC2/SVR4 compatibility > modules, and src/sys/nfs/nfs_subs.c as well. In both of these cases, what is the appropriate value to choose if the local ENOATTR doesn't map into a convenient remote/emulated errno value? Robert N M Watson robert@fledge.watson.org http://www.watson.org/~robert/ PGP key fingerprint: AF B5 5F FF A6 4A 79 37 ED 5F 55 E9 58 04 6A B1 TIS Labs at Network Associates, Safeport Network Services To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message