From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul 28 19:38:57 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78314106566B
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:38:57 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [87.229.73.95])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5528FC0C
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:38:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from server.mypc.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1DF414DC373;
	Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:38:55 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at server.mypc.hu
Received: from server.mypc.hu ([127.0.0.1])
	by server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id 6UkSMItUZYnL; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:38:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.105] (catv-80-99-92-167.catv.broadband.hu
	[80.99.92.167])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 764B214DC368;
	Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:38:53 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4C50874B.4010000@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:38:51 +0200
From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-PT;
	rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no>
References: <AANLkTimJiV1s3KNsCKsqT_dNiqMyRuOFpK47AD4QyMUO@mail.gmail.com>	<4C5040E8.3050304@FreeBSD.org>	<AANLkTi=d0Ev_JwE5AFHNMSyPrWYTd7PYTSGn2W91prHA@mail.gmail.com>	<4C504DEA.9070405@FreeBSD.org>
	<86wrsfk3oy.fsf@ds4.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <86wrsfk3oy.fsf@ds4.des.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: BSD grep fixes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:38:57 -0000

Em 2010.07.28. 17:48, Dag-Erling Smørgrav escreveu:
> Gabor Kovesdan<gabor@FreeBSD.org>  writes:
>    
>> b. f.<bf1783@gmail.com>  writes:
>>      
>>> I don't think that the current behavior of bsdgrep is necessarily bad
>>> -- in fact it seems to me to be simple and intuitive: nothing is
>>> excluded or included implicitly, and (I think) the last match wins,
>>> unlike in gnu grep.
>>>        
>> Ok, thanks, then I'll just document it.
>>      
> Uh, no.  GNU grep's behavior is consistent with just about everything
> else that has --include / --exclude options, e.g. tar and rsync.  Please
> change BSD grep's behavior to match GNU grep's.
>    
Ok, thanks for mentioning this. I already have a patch to implement the 
same behaviour, I'll discuss it with my mentor and fix soon.

Gabor