Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 11:29:34 -0800 From: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> To: "Juan Tumani" <jtumani55@hotmail.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.2 v/s FreeBSD 4.9 MFLOPS performance (gcc3.3.3 v/s gcc2.9.5) Message-ID: <200402101129.34337.wes@softweyr.com> In-Reply-To: <BAY12-F37zmBUw7MurD00010899@hotmail.com> References: <BAY12-F37zmBUw7MurD00010899@hotmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 09 February 2004 13:20, Juan Tumani wrote:
> I have an Intel D845GE m/b w/ a P4 1.7 CPU and I have the box setup
> to dual boot to either 4.9 or 5.2. Both OS are right off the latest
> posted iso CD image, i.e., no updates, no kernel tweaks, everything
> vanilla right out of the box. I compiled flops.c on both 4.9 and
> 5.2 and the 5.2 performance is less than half that of 4.9: 760
> MFLOPS on 4.9 v/s 340 MFLOPS on 5.2.
>
> I tried turning off the SMP and other kernel tweaks and no
> improvement in 5.2. I then downloaded and installed gcc295 on the
> 5.2 machine and that fixed the problem. So now all I have to do is
> figure out the gcc 3.3.3 switches to make it run like gcc 2.9.5 or
> figure out how to rebuild 5.2 w/ gcc 2.9.5 :-).
I'm not sure that kernel tweaks are going to make much difference on a
single-threaded floating point benchmark. Compiler optimizations sure
do, though. (Note: I couldn't find version 1.2 of flops.c, so this is
based on version 2.0.) On a 2.0GHz P4, I see:
wpeters@salty> cc -o flops -O -DUNIX flops.c
flops.c: In function `main':
flops.c:174: warning: return type of `main' is not `int'
wpeters@salty> ./flops
FLOPS C Program (Double Precision), V2.0 18 Dec 1992
Module Error RunTime MFLOPS
(usec)
1 4.0146e-13 0.0301 465.4460
2 -1.4166e-13 0.0619 113.0049
3 4.7184e-14 0.0365 465.3564
4 -1.2557e-13 0.0327 458.7438
5 -1.3800e-13 0.0482 601.5539
6 3.2380e-13 0.0470 617.2479
7 -8.4583e-11 0.1692 70.9097
8 3.4867e-13 0.0510 587.8699
Iterations = 512000000
NullTime (usec) = 0.0008
MFLOPS(1) = 150.1795
MFLOPS(2) = 174.4286
MFLOPS(3) = 352.0107
MFLOPS(4) = 544.1166
wpeters@salty> cc -o flops3 -O3 -mcpu=pentium4 -msse2 -DUNIX flops.c
flops.c: In function `main':
flops.c:174: warning: return type of `main' is not `int'
wpeters@salty> ./flops3
FLOPS C Program (Double Precision), V2.0 18 Dec 1992
Module Error RunTime MFLOPS
(usec)
1 4.0146e-13 0.0202 692.2121
2 -1.4166e-13 0.0199 351.9018
3 4.7184e-14 0.0251 676.9230
4 -1.2557e-13 0.0235 637.0627
5 -1.3800e-13 0.0446 650.2407
6 3.2380e-13 0.0436 665.0579
7 -8.4583e-11 0.0567 211.8219
8 3.4867e-13 0.0436 687.5249
Iterations = 512000000
NullTime (usec) = 0.0006
MFLOPS(1) = 417.4252
MFLOPS(2) = 396.1492
MFLOPS(3) = 567.2668
MFLOPS(4) = 669.6139
Pretty good increases across the board. Slightly off-topic, the same
test on my Athlon XP 2000+ at home yields:
-bash-2.05b$ cc -o flops3 -O3 -mcpu=athlon-xp -msse2 -DUNIX flops.c
flops.c: In function `main':
flops.c:174: warning: return type of `main' is not `int'
-bash-2.05b$ ./flops3
FLOPS C Program (Double Precision), V2.0 18 Dec 1992
Module Error RunTime MFLOPS
(usec)
Illegal instruction (core dumped)
Oh, duh, Athlon doesn't have SSE2. Try again:
-bash-2.05b$ cc -o flops3 -O3 -mcpu=athlon-xp -msse -DUNIX flops.c
flops.c: In function `main':
flops.c:174: warning: return type of `main' is not `int'
-bash-2.05b$ ./flops3
FLOPS C Program (Double Precision), V2.0 18 Dec 1992
Module Error RunTime MFLOPS
(usec)
1 4.0146e-13 0.0145 965.8007
2 -1.4166e-13 0.0108 649.9764
3 4.7184e-14 0.0146 1162.1140
4 -1.2557e-13 0.0120 1250.0460
5 -1.3800e-13 0.0259 1118.8725
6 3.2380e-13 0.0209 1390.5740
7 -8.4583e-11 0.0310 387.7082
8 3.4867e-13 0.0277 1082.6515
Iterations = 512000000
NullTime (usec) = 0.0012
MFLOPS(1) = 759.3833
MFLOPS(2) = 717.9906
MFLOPS(3) = 996.1904
MFLOPS(4) = 1210.2268
Wowsers. Looks like if you're doing floating point, at least floating
point loops that fit in the Athlon cache, you're a lot better off with
Athlon than P4.
You might want to try -funroll-loops, but that's enough effort for a
decade-old benchmark. For me, at least.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters wes@softweyr.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200402101129.34337.wes>