From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 14 18:46:41 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B669116A4CF
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 18:46:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sccimhc92.asp.att.net (sccimhc92.asp.att.net [63.240.76.166])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E29C43D31
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 18:46:41 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from freebsd@nbritton.org)
Received: from [192.168.1.10]
	(12-223-129-46.client.insightbb.com[12.223.129.46])
	by sccimhc92.asp.att.net (sccimhc92) with ESMTP
	id <20050114184640i9200itaene>; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 18:46:40 +0000
Message-ID: <41E8138E.4050109@nbritton.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:46:38 -0600
From: Nikolas Britton <freebsd@nbritton.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041230)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Freebsd0101@aol.com
References: <1dc.346b404d.2f1967b4@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <1dc.346b404d.2f1967b4@aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: zettel@acm.org
cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Thank you!
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 18:46:41 -0000

Freebsd0101@aol.com wrote:

>In a message dated 1/14/05 1:07:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, zettel@acm.org 
>writes:
>  
>
>>>still-under-development 5.x. Which seems counterproductive for an O/S
>>>that is trying to establish itself as a choice as a server platform.
>>>      
>>>
>>Not necessarily. The interesting question hasn't been addressed yet.
>>Is 5.3 on its fastest supported chipset faster or slower than 4.10 on
>>its fastest supported chipset?
>>    
>>
>----
>Thats a sad commentary, if the "new" version of FreeBSD is 5% faster on 
>a hardware platform that should be 30% faster. Is that the goal you seek?
>
>so you have to pay 50% more to get the same performance on 5.3. Thats
>quite a selling point!
>  
>

Is that you Tm4528@aol.com?, whats TM for btw, Troll Master?