Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 16:55:33 +0000 (GMT) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@render.com> To: Nate Williams <nate@sri.mt.net> Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-usrsbin@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/ppp chap.c fsm.c hdlc.h ip.c lcp.c lqr.c lqr.h main.c modem.c pap.c pred.c vjcomp.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960201165311.17901G-100000@minnow.render.com> In-Reply-To: <199601301651.JAA12105@rocky.sri.MT.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 30 Jan 1996, Nate Williams wrote: > > dfr 96/01/30 03:08:59 > > > > Modified: usr.sbin/ppp chap.c fsm.c hdlc.h ip.c lcp.c lqr.c lqr.h > > main.c modem.c pap.c pred.c vjcomp.c > > Log: > > Some patches to ppp which improve stability. I have been running a > > ppp based on these patches for about 3 weeks with no downtime. > > Can you bring these patches into -stable as well? I suspect they patch > against -stable much better anyway. :) I don't know if I am qualified to commit to -stable :-) The patches go on top of the previous set of compile-warning patches, so they wouldn't apply directly to -stable. For what its worth, I am running this ppp on -stable, with approximately 4 weeks uptime. -- Doug Rabson, Microsoft RenderMorphics Ltd. Mail: dfr@render.com Phone: +44 171 251 4411 FAX: +44 171 251 0939
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960201165311.17901G-100000>