Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:17:09 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> To: Dima Dorfman <dima@trit.org> Cc: audit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VT_LOCKSWITCH Message-ID: <20020711091709.GC736@starjuice.net> In-Reply-To: <20020710050455.E28483EFB@turbine.trit.org> References: <43415.1022589698@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> <20020710050455.E28483EFB@turbine.trit.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On (2002/07/10 05:04), Dima Dorfman wrote: > > If you're up to it, I'd love to see the same functionality available as > > an extension to lock(1). Imagine the convenience of being able to type > > > > lock -npS > > > > on just one terminal and not have to worry about the rest! > > Sounds nice. How about the following patch? Dima, this kicks ass! I don't have time to review your patch, but the resulting binary is something I've wanted in the base system for a couple of years. Thanks! > P.S. Does anyone know what this is for: > > if (ioctl(0, TIOCGETP, &ntty)) > exit(1); > > It's at line 232 after the patch (210 before the patch). ntty isn't > used anywhere in or after the loop the above is in, so it seems pretty > pointless. I think that's just to check that feedback echo is still turned off, no? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020711091709.GC736>