From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 15:24:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7035B106564A for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2011 15:24:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from fep11.mx.upcmail.net (fep11.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77ED8FC08 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2011 15:24:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edge01.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.236]) by viefep11-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.02.02 201-2260-120-106-20100312) with ESMTP id <20110102152449.LYTM28175.viefep11-int.chello.at@edge01.upcmail.net> for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2011 16:24:49 +0100 Received: from pinky ([213.46.23.80]) by edge01.upcmail.net with edge id qfQo1f00Q1jgp3H01fQpu2; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 16:24:49 +0100 X-SourceIP: 213.46.23.80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <4D1C6F90.3080206@my.gd> <4D1F442F.8060801@my.gd> <4D208C55.9080409@my.gd> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 16:24:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4D208C55.9080409@my.gd> User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.00 (Win32) X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=kRmApA04uPli/d8B8u1M0swu98hronvs6VvAqI8uQP0= c=1 sm=0 a=tZDC3L0OECsA:10 a=bgpUlknNv7MA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=hLuhQxTjI5YOYCVGivYA:9 a=7cfVa2-A4pEzs-RSc2k64njx2TUA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=iGhaP2GBsIPPIOcz:21 a=hVrLo3FZL7S-a0Rb:21 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Subject: Re: ZFS - moving from a zraid1 to zraid2 pool with 1.5tb disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 15:24:52 -0000 On Sun, 02 Jan 2011 15:31:49 +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > > On 1/1/11 6:28 PM, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: >> On 2 January 2011 02:11, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> >>> I remember getting rather average performance on v14 but Jean-Yves >>> reported good performance boosts from upgrading to v15. >> >> that was v28 :) >> >> saw no major difference between v14 and v15. >> >> JY > > > Oopsie :) > > > Seeing I for one will have no backups, I think I won't be using v28 on > this box, and stick with v15 instead. > > > Are there any views regarding the "best" implementation for a system ? > > I currently have a ZFS only system but I'm planning on moving it to UFS, > with ZFS used only for mass storage. > > > I understand ZFS root is much trickier, and my main fear is that if I > somehow break ZFS (by upgrading to v28 for example) I won't be able to > boot anymore, thus no repair process... You can repair by booting from USB of CD in a lot of cases. Ronald.