Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 02 Jan 2011 16:24:48 +0100
From:      "Ronald Klop" <ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ZFS - moving from a zraid1 to zraid2 pool with 1.5tb disks
Message-ID:  <op.voos3mph8527sy@pinky>
In-Reply-To: <4D208C55.9080409@my.gd>
References:  <4D1C6F90.3080206@my.gd> <op.vojfsirj8527sy@212-123-145-58.ip.telfort.nl> <4D1F442F.8060801@my.gd> <AANLkTi=ec9=nE7rQ01Hwk-%2BbUc7CaFsh9f9a5wGLcWJV@mail.gmail.com> <4D208C55.9080409@my.gd>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 02 Jan 2011 15:31:49 +0100, Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd> wrote:

>
>
> On 1/1/11 6:28 PM, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
>> On 2 January 2011 02:11, Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd> wrote:
>>
>>> I remember getting rather average performance on v14 but Jean-Yves
>>> reported good performance boosts from upgrading to v15.
>>
>> that was v28 :)
>>
>> saw no major difference between v14 and v15.
>>
>> JY
>
>
> Oopsie :)
>
>
> Seeing I for one will have no backups, I think I won't be using v28 on
> this box, and stick with v15 instead.
>
>
> Are there any views regarding the "best" implementation for a system ?
>
> I currently have a ZFS only system but I'm planning on moving it to UFS,
> with ZFS used only for mass storage.
>
>
> I understand ZFS root is much trickier, and my main fear is that if I
> somehow break ZFS (by upgrading to v28 for example) I won't be able to
> boot anymore, thus no repair process...

You can repair by booting from USB of CD in a lot of cases.

Ronald.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.voos3mph8527sy>