Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 08:07:20 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> To: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>, egoitz@ramattack.net, Freebsd fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, Freebsd hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: M2 NVME support Message-ID: <70dd5c7a-d37d-2463-ea34-e05c081ab325@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <CAOjFWZ5fzd8FRiS6n0jxY4LTAJdLo4TLBLP0TYWjf9nQQCrsAw@mail.gmail.com> References: <a0c12351e21588a8e767988e1367ae9f@ramattack.net> <ZDfpGHKmWWa0Qpn0@graf.pompo.net> <CAOjFWZ5fzd8FRiS6n0jxY4LTAJdLo4TLBLP0TYWjf9nQQCrsAw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/13/23 18:43, Freddie Cash wrote: > If you want the best performance, and money isn't a restriction, then > you'll want to look into servers that have U.2 (or whatever the next-gen > small form factor interface name is) slots and backplanes. The > drives cost a lot more than regular M.2 SSDs But, being "enterprise" drive, this is perhaps justified. Actually they can even cost less than (slower) SATA "enterprise" drives. Of course you'll need to add the cost of a controller, which you have almost always "for free" for SATA. bye av.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?70dd5c7a-d37d-2463-ea34-e05c081ab325>