From owner-freebsd-fs Mon Feb 9 16:42:43 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA04280 for freebsd-fs-outgoing; Mon, 9 Feb 1998 16:42:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from iconetworks.com (psycho2.iconetworks.net [204.94.129.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA04275 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 1998 16:42:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roark_hilomen_at_meridian@meridian-data.com) From: roark_hilomen_at_meridian@meridian-data.com Received: from meridian-data.com (cdserv.meridian-data.com [204.94.131.20]) by ICONETWORKS (8.8.5/8.8.2/103196) with SMTP id QAA12114 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 1998 16:42:40 -0800 Received: from ccMail by meridian-data.com (ccMail Link to SMTP R8.00.01) id AA887071056; Mon, 09 Feb 98 16:38:08 -0800 Message-Id: <9802098870.AA887071056@meridian-data.com> X-Mailer: ccMail Link to SMTP R8.00.01 Date: Mon, 09 Feb 98 16:43:15 -0800 To: Subject: Soft update usage MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Does anyone know if "Soft Updates" has been in use in the industry or is OpenBSD and now FreeBSD the first to implement it? How extensively has it been tested (outside the current FreeBSD flurry)? And for that matter, is anyone testing it on a large multi-client system? Has anyone tried crashing it and seeing if FSCK works well and as advertised with Soft Updates? I'm trying to see how cutting edge this technology is. Thanks, Roark To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message