From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 15:24:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8F3106566B; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:24:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67BD8FC08; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q54FOYsB020594; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:24:34 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q54FOYnQ020593; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:24:34 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 17:24:31 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: "O. Hartmann" Message-ID: <20120604152431.GD73254@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <2421561.4aJcXPZZxh@x220.ovitrap.com> <4FCB38F2.4030505@ateamsystems.com> <3851080.JQJobqxLc8@x220.ovitrap.com> <4FCBCF49.1010206@zedat.fu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pZs/OQEoSSbxGlYw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FCBCF49.1010206@zedat.fu-berlin.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Erich , "freebs >> Current FreeBSD" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Adam Strohl Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 15:24:35 -0000 --pZs/OQEoSSbxGlYw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 10:55:37PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > On 06/03/12 15:29, Erich wrote: > >> > >> And if a port build is broken then the maintainer needs to fix it, tha= t=20 > >> is the solution. >=20 > Look at the comment of the maintainer of LibreOffice ... LibreOffice is not a small port, I managed to make 3.5.x work until the boost upgrade indirectly broke it. LibreOffice is quite complicated to work= on and I am only working on it to maintain it alive. Other projects like pkgng= and some huge changes on the port infrastructure are taking all my free time right n= ow. Remember this is a volunteer work, I already sent request for people to be help on LibreOffice. I got some help from time to time, but noone really co= me to take the hard work on LibreOffice, so yes my replies are still the same I'm just try= ing to keep it alive I missed 3.5.3 and now we are at 3.5.4 and I don't know when = I'll start to work. The work on it is not that complicated but it requires a huge amount of time which I currently don't have, and upstream is really nice to help porting. Sorry, Bapt --pZs/OQEoSSbxGlYw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/M0y8ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwfHgCglSlGEz+GKbR8lkqGk9++9ekw hYoAn2e05cnJMimmpM+wyPSw+57nRYfO =JRgH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pZs/OQEoSSbxGlYw--