From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 15:40:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79EBF1065670 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:40:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefan.lambrev@moneybookers.com) Received: from sfgw1.moneybookers.com (sfgw1.moneybookers.com [195.34.111.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263728FC0A for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:40:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sfgw1.moneybookers.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sfgw1.moneybookers.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F221EB40CF3; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:23:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from maylo.moneybookers.com (maylo.dev.moneybookers.net [192.168.3.20]) by sfgw1.moneybookers.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378EDB40CDF; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:23:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from hater.sf.moneybookers.net (hater.sf.moneybookers.net [10.129.23.125]) by maylo.moneybookers.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7869E37BF82E; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:23:11 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Stefan Lambrev In-Reply-To: <448737.83863.qm@web110508.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 17:23:11 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <52B3EE9B-9B4A-4F96-ADE3-83F56135183D@moneybookers.com> References: <4D26FBD3.20307@quip.cz> <448737.83863.qm@web110508.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> To: Paul Pathiakis X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.1 at gw1.sof.moneybookers.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on gw1.sof.moneybookers.net Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Subject: Re: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 15:40:05 -0000 Hi, Having in mind that a SAS enterprise disk normally can handle = 150-180IOPS, this benchmark is testing something else ;) Well there is a one thing which is clear from almost every Phoronix = benchmark - Linux is heavily optimized ... for unpacking the linux = kernel :) On Jan 7, 2011, at 4:12 PM, Paul Pathiakis wrote: > The results came out like this: >=20 > EXT3 - ~3000 tps > EXT4 - ~3800 tps > XFS - ~ 1800 tps > ZFS - 75000 tps -- Best Wishes, Stefan Lambrev ICQ# 24134177