From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Sep 6 17:33:09 1995 Return-Path: bugs-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id RAA00374 for bugs-outgoing; Wed, 6 Sep 1995 17:33:09 -0700 Received: from wcarchive.cdrom.com (wcarchive.cdrom.com [192.216.191.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA00368 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 1995 17:33:07 -0700 Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.34]) by wcarchive.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA02805 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 1995 17:35:07 -0700 Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id KAA08719; Thu, 7 Sep 1995 10:30:35 +1000 Date: Thu, 7 Sep 1995 10:30:35 +1000 From: Bruce Evans Message-Id: <199509070030.KAA08719@godzilla.zeta.org.au> To: freebsd-bugs@wcarchive.cdrom.com, hobbit@avian.org Subject: Re: sed bug? Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >I have stumbled across an inconsistency in FreeBSD 'sed'. On every other >platform I have access to, the regex `/[/|]/' to mean "slash or pipe" is valid, >but the FreeBSD version errors out on this. Trying to quote the embedded >slash, a la `/[\/|]/', avoids the error, but that breaks on other systems >that match on `\` as well. One or the other is clearly wrong. This was fixed in 2.2-current on Aug 16 and in 2.1 on Aug 26. Bruce