From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 22 20:32:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E411065673 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:32:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD0E8FC0A for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:32:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id n3MKWXar052808; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:32:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n3MKWWN3052807; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:32:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:32:32 +0200 From: Marius Strobl To: David Christensen Message-ID: <20090422203232.GC50221@alchemy.franken.de> References: <20090420204637.GA1236@mr-happy.com> <20090421184924.GA36542@alchemy.franken.de> <20090421193129.GA4869@mr-happy.com> <20090421195510.GC33994@alchemy.franken.de> <20090422150612.GA1231@mr-happy.com> <20090422192644.GA52151@alchemy.franken.de> <5D267A3F22FD854F8F48B3D2B523819339D9F5A64D@IRVEXCHCCR01.corp.ad.broadcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5D267A3F22FD854F8F48B3D2B523819339D9F5A64D@IRVEXCHCCR01.corp.ad.broadcom.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Jeff Blank , "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: bge problems under 7.2-PRERELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:32:37 -0000 On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:21:58PM -0700, David Christensen wrote: > > > > Then update if_bge.c to rev > > > > 1.198.2.14 and check whether things still work, > > > > > > this causes the problem to resurface. > > > > > > > David, > > > > this is the second report that using MSI with a BCM5754/ > > chip=0x167a14e4 results in no interrupts, is there any errata > > about this? > > Nope, no errata for MSI on the 5754, nor can I recall any > MSI problems on any of the PCIe based devices. Do the > systems share a common root complex that might be the source > of the issue? > This one useses a: none0@pci0:0:0:0: class=0x050000 card=0x02f010de chip=0x02f010de rev=0xa2 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Nvidia Corp' device = 'C51 Host Bridge' class = memory subclass = RAM At least Linux doesn't seem to avoid using MSI with these. I didn't get any further regarding the other report so far. Marius