From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Apr 12 15:10:02 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA08338 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 15:10:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA08325; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 15:10:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 15:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199804122210.PAA08325@hub.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports Cc: From: Tim Vanderhoek Subject: Re: ports/6282: xforms port checksum mismatch Reply-To: Tim Vanderhoek Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/6282; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tim Vanderhoek To: Brian Handy Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@hub.freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/6282: xforms port checksum mismatch Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 18:04:52 -0400 (EDT) On Sun, 12 Apr 1998, Brian Handy wrote: > Hmmm...where'd it fetch the port from? I just fetched it from the French > site, (#2 in the MASTER_SITES list) and it worked fine. If we've got The one on the uwm site is v.0.88.1, but the one on the French site is v.0.88. Most of the differences are superficial. The port may need to be updated. Hopefully the French site and the Japanese site (also at the old version) will quickly mirror the update. From the diffs between the two versions, it looks like a simple update. -- tIM...HOEk OPTIMIZATION: the process of using many one-letter variables names hoping that the resultant code will run faster. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message