Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:28:44 -0600
From:      "Larry Rosenman" <ler@lerctr.org>
To:        "'Torfinn Ingolfsen'" <torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no>, <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: linux-o-lator
Message-ID:  <02fe01c61d3f$5383ce90$0a0a0a0a@aus.pervasive.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060119222442.14f1a9b0.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:42:22 -0600
> Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> wrote:
> 
>>> This should force the port to look for i386 rpms
>> it works fine as Brooks suggested in another mail standalone outside
>> of portupgrade(1). 
>> 
>> So, it apparently is an oddity in the portupgrade environment.
>> 
>> linprocfs is NOT mounted, fwiw.
>> 
>> Should I send-pr this?
> 
> This should already have been fixed, see
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=90252
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80679
> 
> Isn't that patch merged, or doesn't it work?

The fallback brand seems to be there.  What I saw was it trying to pull
amd64 RPM's.

LER


-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 512-248-2683                 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?02fe01c61d3f$5383ce90$0a0a0a0a>