Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 13:13:32 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz> To: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: Michael Schuh <michael.schuh@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux Message-ID: <20050628111332.GC48140@isis.sigpipe.cz> In-Reply-To: <200506281904.48464.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <1dbad315050621051525f4c6fc@mail.gmail.com> <200506211451.j5LEpA2W024350@lurza.secnetix.de> <20050628092126.GB48140@isis.sigpipe.cz> <200506281904.48464.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# doconnor@gsoft.com.au / 2005-06-28 19:04:18 +0930:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:51, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > No you don't. You want to make a side-by-side comparison
> > of two products, and if one of them underperforms, it just
> > underperforms. You cannot use a poor location selection
> > strategy in the driver as an excuse for poor operation.
> dd is a useful start, but you shouldn't read too much into the results since,
> in general, dd doesn't reflect real world usage patterns.
Huh? Various people have reacted to the "dd doesn't reflect real
world" with "but I *do* use dd in real world".
--
How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb?
You don't know, man. You don't KNOW.
Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050628111332.GC48140>