Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 01:03:19 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> To: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com>, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Subject: Re: NOT installing the .la files Message-ID: <200606140103.24517.lofi@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <m3k67k3h1i.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> References: <200606112110.39148@aldan> <20060613170732.tql5t2lsn4w4ggog@netchild.homeip.net> <m3k67k3h1i.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart23012305.VlUhsWa6tC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday, 13. June 2006 23:02, Matthias Andree wrote: > Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> writes: > > As already visible in the mail you reply to: I agree that it is a good > > idea to keep libtool as close as possible to the upstream version. > > Can we as port maintainers take this - and other relevant posts - as the > "go ahead" for not jumping hoops to remove .la files if some third-party > software we port installs them? Absolutely. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart23012305.VlUhsWa6tC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEj0Q8Xhc68WspdLARAiLFAKCr2szQW5wiS8oE239oFW+BoWuDiACeL5Yv VbX81cKJ7kAFY/hAHvQi+m8= =RGle -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart23012305.VlUhsWa6tC--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200606140103.24517.lofi>