From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jul  4 00:44:20 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F97F16A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun,  4 Jul 2004 00:44:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from www.cray1.de (i.would.like.to.spoof.my.realip.de
	[64.27.85.120])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED8443D2F
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun,  4 Jul 2004 00:44:19 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ubm@u-boot-man.de)
Received: from greatsheep.marines (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by www.cray1.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id CAA24219
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 02:44:14 +0200
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 02:44:16 +0200
From: Marc "UBM" Bocklet <ubm@u-boot-man.de>
To: current@freebsd.org
Message-Id: <20040704024416.4b9463df.ubm@u-boot-man.de>
In-Reply-To: <20040704001816.GA91326@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <20040703231027.GA74329@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0407031907020.21004-100000@pancho>
	<20040704001816.GA91326@xor.obsecurity.org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2.1)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: ACPI-CA 20040527 import
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 00:44:20 -0000

On Sat, 3 Jul 2004 17:18:16 -0700
Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 07:14:31PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > 
> > > Then either make -O2 mandatory for developers by putting it in
> > > make.conf, or don't complain that developers aren't building with
> > > your private special settings.
> > 
> > Um, am I missing something, or would not putting -O2 in
> > /etc/make.conf also suddenly start making ports with -O2 also?  Has
> > anyone ever tried this?
> 
> COPTFLAGS is only used for kernel builds.  Also, other platforms have
> -O2 enabled by default for kernel builds, but not i386.

Hmm, what I've been wondering for some time: Is there a perceivable
performance gain by using -Ox instead of -O?

Bye
Marc

-- 
"And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?"

W.B. Yeats, The Second Coming