From owner-freebsd-doc Fri Oct 8 1:31:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from rucus.ru.ac.za (rucus.ru.ac.za [146.231.29.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8851314E0B for ; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 01:31:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nbm@rucus.ru.ac.za) Received: (qmail 29885 invoked by uid 1003); 8 Oct 1999 08:33:33 -0000 Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 10:33:32 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner To: Nik Clayton Cc: John Baldwin , Narvi , FreeBSD Documentation Project Subject: Re: Two spaces OK Message-ID: <19991008103332.A28390@rucus.ru.ac.za> References: <199910061903.PAA27697@server.baldwin.cx> <19991008003319.B8995@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i In-Reply-To: <19991008003319.B8995@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri 1999-10-08 (00:33), Nik Clayton wrote: > It's not quite as simple as a sed script though -- you need to watch for > , , , and so on, and make sure that > they stay untouched. You could always use a sed script, then examine the > 'cvs diff' output, and go and put back anything that shouldn't have been > touched. Myself, I tend to just use search/replace in Emacs, and bounce > on the "repeat-complex-command" key. On a separate note - I can't see any representitive difference between: #include "foo" blah and #include "foo" blah And the second is much more readable... (same with ) Am I missing something important, though? I remember the previous short war no this issue, in which the first won, but I don't remember the exact reason why it did. I've started codifying my previous suggestions for the primer, and I'd like some feedback on this issue either way. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner nbm@rucus.ru.ac.za To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message