From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jul 28 17:50:08 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA18657 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jul 1997 17:50:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA18650 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 1997 17:50:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA28967; Mon, 28 Jul 1997 17:51:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199707290051.RAA28967@implode.root.com> To: spork cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: de0 problem 2.2-STABLE In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 28 Jul 1997 19:33:56 EDT." From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 17:51:25 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >I tried the Intel cards as well, but found that they had changed the rev >on them since DG put one in wcarchive. What is the preferred PCI 10/100 >card these days? All versions of the PCI Pro/100B should work fine in 2.2-stable. If there is a version that doesn't, I want to know about it. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project