From owner-cvs-all Sat Jun 5 7:26:59 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mail.kt.rim.or.jp (mail.kt.rim.or.jp [202.247.130.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC0B814F42; Sat, 5 Jun 1999 07:26:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp) Received: from moon.sky.rim.or.jp (ppp365.kt.rim.or.jp [202.247.140.65]) by mail.kt.rim.or.jp (8.8.8/3.6W-RIMNET-98-06-09) with ESMTP id XAA03816; Sat, 5 Jun 1999 23:26:51 +0900 (JST) Received: from sky.rim.or.jp (earth.sky.rim.or.jp [192.168.1.2]) by moon.sky.rim.or.jp (8.8.8/3.5Wpl4/moon-1.0) with ESMTP id XAA23620; Sat, 5 Jun 1999 23:26:48 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <37593366.FB27E7C8@sky.rim.or.jp> Date: Sat, 05 Jun 1999 23:25:42 +0900 From: Jun Kuriyama X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [ja] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nik Clayton Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/textproc/docproj Makefile References: <199906031956.MAA24479@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Nik Clayton wrote: > Depend on the textproc/docbook meta-port, instead of explicitly listing > the version number as docbook-300. Why? Does we depend on docbook-241 or docbook-300? Should we minimalize dependency list to build handbook? -- Jun Kuriyama // kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp // kuriyama@FreeBSD.ORG To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message