From owner-freebsd-apache@freebsd.org Fri Jan 3 17:35:17 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-apache@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6224E1F632B for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 17:35:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47qBr5235Nz45Py for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 17:35:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4479B1F6326; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 17:35:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: apache@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443CC1F6325 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 17:35:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47qBr519yvz45Pw for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 17:35:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BC062FA70 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 17:35:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 003HZGVK056119 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 17:35:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 003HZG67056118 for apache@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 17:35:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 242680] devel/subversion Fails to build on FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE-p1 32 bit: libapr-1.so: undefined reference to `__sync_* Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 17:35:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: lfmorrison@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: apache@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback? merge-quarterly? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 17:35:17 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D242680 lfmorrison@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lfmorrison@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from lfmorrison@gmail.com --- These missing symbols appear to be associated with GCC's extensions for ato= mic data handling. See, for example: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.2.0/gcc/Atomic-Builtins.html (base GCC= 4.2 specification) https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-9.2.0/gcc/_005f_005fsync-Builtins.html#g= _t_005f_005fsync-Builtins (deprecated GCC9 feature) https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-9.2.0/gcc/_005f_005fatomic-Builtins.html= #g_t_005f_005fatomic-Builtins (currently supported GCC9 equivalent) It is possible that linkage to GCC's libatomic might be needed in order to resolve these symbols? (I know that libatomic.so is installed as part of the GCC9 port for powerpc, but I don't know if there's an equivalent library supplied with the base compiler.) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.=