From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 24 10:26:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D1637B401 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 10:26:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thor.acuson.com (ac17859.acuson.com [157.226.71.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0EAD43FA3 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 10:26:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DavidJohnson@Siemens.com) Received: from mvaexch02.acuson.com (mvaexch02.acuson.com [157.226.230.209]) by thor.acuson.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 (built Feb 21 2002)) with ESMTP id <0HDU00E7UZ26N3@thor.acuson.com> for advocacy@freebsd.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 10:25:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mvaexch02.acuson.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 10:15:42 -0700 Received: from dhcp-46-117.acuson.com ([157.226.46.117]) by mvaexch01.acuson.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id JQ7L8WPM; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 10:17:09 -0700 Content-return: allowed Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 10:25:33 -0700 From: Johnson David In-reply-to: <20030424161427.GA80375@q.closedsrc.org> To: Linh Pham , advocacy@freebsd.org Message-id: <200304241025.33655.DavidJohnson@Siemens.com> Organization: Siemens Medical Systems MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <20030424161427.GA80375@q.closedsrc.org> Subject: Re: OSDL and their stance on BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:26:06 -0000 On Thursday 24 April 2003 09:14 am, Linh Pham wrote: > To me, it seems that it's another group using the "Open Source" mark > to garner the attention of the media and companies, yet only provide > assistance in building up Open Source software only for Linux. > > What do you guys think and what action should we take? Maybe we could start the Free Software Development Labs :-) David