From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 5 14:41:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DCB716A4CE; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 14:41:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D3143D2F; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 14:41:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 3B4BA530E; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 23:41:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 28A97530A; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 23:41:17 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 0D03333CA4; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 23:41:17 +0100 (CET) To: Daniela References: <200403051855.35905.dgw@liwest.at> <20040305200825.N38020@haldjas.folklore.ee> <200403052247.37202.dgw@liwest.at> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 23:41:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200403052247.37202.dgw@liwest.at> (dgw@liwest.at's message of "Fri, 5 Mar 2004 22:47:37 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.63 cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Most wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 22:41:22 -0000 Daniela writes: > I know, by experience, that my code is always much faster than the > compiler-generated code. *rotfl* seriously, grow up. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no