From owner-freebsd-alpha Fri Sep 6 12:15:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5124037B401 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 12:15:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8810C43E6A for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 12:15:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA18464; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 15:15:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.6/8.9.1) id g86JF0F60208; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 15:15:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15736.65204.564404.552876@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 15:15:00 -0400 (EDT) To: Jan Lentfer Cc: Joe Marcus Clarke , alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mozilla failure on 4.6.2 In-Reply-To: <1031338877.5209.2.camel@jan-linux.lan> References: <20020906040641.GA61111@xor.obsecurity.org> <1031287598.361.2.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <15736.40749.986834.818558@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <1031329151.342.9.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <15736.58229.652949.93794@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <1031333130.342.46.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <15736.59259.51892.798026@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <1031337204.342.49.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <1031338877.5209.2.camel@jan-linux.lan> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Jan Lentfer writes: > > > Do you know what, if any, differences there are between our g++ and > > > the one linux uses? I'll be the first to admit that I don't know jack > > > about g++/c++. > > > > Sorry, neither do I. However, the builds of Mozilla I've seen for Linux > > Alpha use GCC 2.96 where as I've been testing with 2.95.x. > > Joe, > > I think wie also tried with gcc31 and both with different optimization > levels (-O & -O0), didn't we? All failed at least :-( None of that matters if the calling conventions are different. Some quick debugging reveals we're jumping off into never-never land, rather than really calling the function which is supposed to be invoked. Eg, we end up in: InvokeTestTarget::InvokeTestTarget() (which contains no code, afaik), rather than InvokeTestTarget::AddTwoInts It might be as simple as adding an offset to something, but I'm about out of time for today. My lunch hour only lasts but so long .. ;) Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message