From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb  2 22:25:21 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C191065694
	for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2009 22:25:20 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from avinogradovs@clearpathnet.com)
Received: from hosting.clearpathnet.com (hosting.clearpathnet.com
	[74.217.144.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21188FC24
	for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2009 22:25:20 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from avinogradovs@clearpathnet.com)
Received: from [10.1.16.109] (la-209-182-100-49 [209.182.100.49] (may be
	forged)) by hosting.clearpathnet.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
	n12MP7vj031856; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:25:11 -0800
Message-ID: <49877302.70806@clearpathnet.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:26:10 -0800
From: Alex Vinogradovs <avinogradovs@clearpathnet.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080915)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
References: <49876D7C.4040003@clearpathnet.com>
	<20090202.152357.168011178.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090202.152357.168011178.imp@bsdimp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: USB/UFS on ARM/IXP435
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:25:22 -0000

Yeah, would be nice to specify it as a mount option... even with performance
penalty.

Alex.

M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <49876D7C.4040003@clearpathnet.com>
>             Alex Vinogradovs <avinogradovs@clearpathnet.com> writes:
> : Guys,
> : 
> : Another observation: UFS systems created on USB device on i386 are not 
> : recognized on
> : ARM, and vice versa. I guess that's something to do with byte ordering. 
> : I've tried removing
> : USB_EHCI_BIG_ENDIAN_DESC in kernel, but that would just render USB unusable.
>
> That's different.
>
> We need to have bi-endian ufs support from NetBSD...
>
> Warner
>