From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Mar 13 18:56:28 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E9E14F31
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 18:56:03 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA05886;
	Sat, 13 Mar 1999 18:56:24 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
To: Rahul Dhesi <dhesi@rahul.net>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: What do people think of May 1st for a 3.2 release date? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 13 Mar 1999 14:08:38 PST."
             <199903132208.AA24401@waltz.rahul.net> 
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 18:56:24 -0800
Message-ID: <5884.921380184@zippy.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Just my opinion:  The next major release of FreeBSD 3.x should be so
> reliable and bug-free that sites can install it and have a high degree
> of confidence that they won't need to apply any bug fixes for at least 6
> months.

That's a fine general thing to want, but it still tells me nothing
about scheduling and that's what this thread is all about. :)

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message