From owner-freebsd-hardware  Thu Nov  6 21:01:10 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hardware>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA09785
          for hardware-outgoing; Thu, 6 Nov 1997 21:01:10 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware)
Received: from scanner.worldgate.com (scanner.worldgate.com [198.161.84.3])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA09773
          for <hardware@freebsd.org>; Thu, 6 Nov 1997 21:01:03 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from marcs@znep.com)
Received: from znep.com (uucp@localhost)
	by scanner.worldgate.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with UUCP id WAA15048
	for hardware@freebsd.org; Thu, 6 Nov 1997 22:01:01 -0700 (MST)
Received: from localhost (marcs@localhost) by alive.znep.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA02058 for <hardware@freebsd.org>; Thu, 6 Nov 1997 22:06:32 -0700 (MST)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 22:06:32 -0700 (MST)
From: Marc Slemko <marcs@znep.com>
To: hardware@freebsd.org
Subject: Intel EtherExpress PRO/100+
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.971106215423.28822M-100000@alive.znep.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Anyone heard anything about this card?  Note the 100+, not 100B.

10/100, single chip design in marketingspeak (not sure how much it pans
out in reality, looks reasonably close), same price as 100B.  

Isn't clear if it is replacing or supplementing 100B.  Anyone know
anything about it?  How different is it to the 100B?

Has an 82558 on it (the B has a 82557 doesn't it?).  Half the rated power
requirements as the B.