Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:50:02 -0500
From:      Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
To:        Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>
Cc:        toolchain@freebsd.org, Tijl Coosemans <tijl@coosemans.org>, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Subject:   Re: Clang as default compiler November 4th
Message-ID:  <CA%2BtpaK2ozzDKfUtjBzjttjqcK9CCLpy0sWNakk7x6qDxdvmfvA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120911171948.GA81334@freebsd.org>
References:  <20120910211207.GC64920@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20120911104518.GF37286@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120911120649.GA52235@freebsd.org> <20120911132410.GA87126@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <504F4645.4070900@FreeBSD.org> <504F4A6B.4010001@coosemans.org> <20120911151230.GB87526@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20120911171948.GA81334@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>wrote:
>
> Can you please provide a small self contained test case that shows
> that clang is doing worse on accuracy than gcc?
>
> So that we can analyze it and decide if it's a bug in the code or
> in the compiler. So far we know absolutely nothing.
>

Not to speak for Steve, but he provided this information in another thread:

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-September/036410.html


-- 
Adam Vande More



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK2ozzDKfUtjBzjttjqcK9CCLpy0sWNakk7x6qDxdvmfvA>