From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 3 11:33:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253041065670 for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 11:33:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD91A8FC0A for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 11:33:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:5188:feac:1539:f0f6]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 01A384AC2D for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 15:33:24 +0400 (MSK) Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 15:33:17 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1144029025.20120503153317@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Is here any plans to support effective (not write-all-blocks-as-from-userland) vop_allocate() for UFS and ZFS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 11:33:26 -0000 Hello, Freebsd-fs. It seems to be very straightforward for UFS/FFS, isn't it? I could try to do this, but only if nobody works on it right now. -- // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov