Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 00:37:25 +0000 From: Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Botero-Lowry <alexbl@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: rcvar function in rc.subr Message-ID: <456A3345.7060505@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200611262235.kAQMZlrB060084@Laptop.mine.box> References: <1161268403.89897.1.camel@mayday.esat.net> <20061126121907.GC60959@comp.chem.msu.su> <4569A113.5080106@FreeBSD.org> <20061126181422.GA66009@comp.chem.msu.su> <200611262125.kAQLPFHS029942@Laptop.mine.box> <456A08DD.2080205@FreeBSD.org> <200611262223.kAQMNvs4054769@Laptop.mine.box> <456A1598.5080904@FreeBSD.org> <200611262235.kAQMZlrB060084@Laptop.mine.box>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
Alexander Botero-Lowry wrote:
>> You don't need to activate services early in the boot process. As I
>> understand it, chkconfig is like gentoo's rc-update. It's just something
> That's about what chkconfig does, it just tends to be an /sbin thing for
> tradition (that's where it is on IRIX I believe)
>
>> you run once you just installed something from ports (in our case).
>> Anyway, that's the same as ${bla#\$}. Won't break whether you have a
> Yeah, I just looked at my code and that's what it does. So I suppose the
> point is moot, but I would definetly ask the NetBSD people why they did it
> maybe they have a good reason.
Will do, just in case. Thanks for rising up the potential issue.
--
Florent Thoumie
flz@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Committer
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFajNJMxEkbVFH3PQRCozvAJ48L9hCYFBL8OPHiKwwbJPk0rl9pgCfRDCV
YXY9tL3iDMTnwAP1wmaaVu8=
=H2+D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?456A3345.7060505>