From owner-freebsd-current Wed Apr 21 12:40:16 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from quackerjack.cc.vt.edu (quackerjack.cc.vt.edu [198.82.160.250]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B07153C5 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 1999 12:39:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jobaldwi@vt.edu) Received: from sable.cc.vt.edu (sable.cc.vt.edu [128.173.16.30]) by quackerjack.cc.vt.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA06520; Wed, 21 Apr 1999 15:37:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from john.baldwin.cx (jobaldwi.campus.vt.edu [198.82.67.63]) by sable.cc.vt.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA18609; Wed, 21 Apr 1999 15:37:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <199904211759.KAA07157@apollo.backplane.com> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 15:37:16 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Matthew Dillon Subject: Re: solid NFS patch #6 avail for -current - need testers files) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 21-Apr-99 Matthew Dillon wrote: > Most of the bug fixes have been backported to -stable. Getting the new > VM system into -stable ( which I want to do just after the 3.2 release ) > is going to require brute force, though. Unfortunately, the most recent > fixes to NFS fall into that category so NFS-centric installations may need > to use -current. > > -Matt > Matthew Dillon > I'm curious, is there any plan to backport egcs to -stable or no? Also, as a side note: good thing we went with egcs, as it was just announced that egcs is now the official gcc. --- John Baldwin -- http://members.freedomnet.com/~jbaldwin/ PGP Key: http://members.freedomnet.com/~jbaldwin/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message