From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Apr 24 04:17:23 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id EAA09300
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 04:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id EAA09295
          Wed, 24 Apr 1996 04:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP
	id m0uC2ZT-0003viC; Wed, 24 Apr 96 04:17 PDT
Received: from localhost.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA10912; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 11:17:17 GMT
X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost.tfs.com didn't use HELO protocol
To: sos@FreeBSD.org
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Anybody playe with ip_filter ?? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 24 Apr 1996 12:41:43 +0200."
             <199604241041.MAA07022@ra.dkuug.dk> 
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 11:17:16 +0000
Message-ID: <10910.830344636@critter.tfs.com>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> In reply to Poul-Henning Kamp who wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > I seems it'll do what I need, anybody got any experience before
> > > I dig in, and should we put in the patches in the kernel, making
> > > it easy to use ??
> > 
> > I have talked with the author, and we kind of agreed to get it in.
> > 
> > The present kernel interface to ipfw should fit ip_filter fine,
> > and we should have no need to modify it further I think...
> 
> Super, who is going to do that & when :)

you, now ?  :-)

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.