From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Nov 6 23:23:22 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id XAA07242 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 6 Nov 1995 23:23:22 -0800 Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA07231 ; Mon, 6 Nov 1995 23:23:15 -0800 Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) id XAA01779; Mon, 6 Nov 1995 23:23:13 -0800 From: Julian Elischer Message-Id: <199511070723.XAA01779@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: suspicion of stuffup in wuftp port To: gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org (Justin T. Gibbs) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 1995 23:23:12 -0800 (PST) Cc: julian@freefall.freebsd.org, hackers@freefall.freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199511070655.WAA00301@aslan.cdrom.com> from "Justin T. Gibbs" at Nov 6, 95 10:55:49 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 943 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > > >the wu-ftpd package is statically linked and appears to be linked to DES crypt > >you can't log in except as 'ftp' no matter what..... > > > >julian > > Oooh that is bad. We linked it static for performance reasons. Satoshi, > what do you want to do about this? The easiest thing would be to just > cludge the package for the 2.1 release by building it on a machine with > MD5 crypt. On OSF we can force a linking with all the libs except what is wanted by specifically mentionning them in the link line.. if this works for FreeBSD we could 'statically link' everything except -lcrypt.. ? would that be a compromise? does it work? how about two of them, and let the user select? (he has to edit /etc/inetd.conf anyhow) > -- > Justin T. Gibbs > =========================================== > Software Developer - Walnut Creek CDROM > FreeBSD: Turning PCs into workstations > =========================================== >