From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 30 08:30:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: arch@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DEA616A41F; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 08:30:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay-er5.mbrd.ru (relay-er5.mbrd.ru [194.117.71.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE48843D46; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 08:30:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from msd.mbrd.ru ([172.16.4.9]) by relay-er5.mbrd.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.x) id 1EA1W8-000Ikd-4h; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:30:52 +0400 Message-ID: <4314193B.80208@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:30:51 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: standards@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: standards/85090: [patch] add memalign() and posix_memalign() functions X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 08:30:55 -0000 Could I hear some comments, need we a memalign() function or not? -- Sem.