From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 8 14:38:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3199D106566B for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 14:38:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dudu@dudu.ro) Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE48A8FC18 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 14:38:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eye4 with SMTP id 4so548620eye.31 for ; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 07:38:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.97.214 with SMTP id m22mr732246fan.29.1315492731512; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 07:38:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.10.3] ([82.76.253.74]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s13sm1473268fad.18.2011.09.08.07.38.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 08 Sep 2011 07:38:49 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Vlad Galu In-Reply-To: <1315492556.23168.45.camel@deadeye> Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 16:38:46 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <1315221674.3092.282.camel@deadeye> <1315492556.23168.45.camel@deadeye> To: Ben Hutchings X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3) Cc: Takuya ASADA , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding Flow Director sysctls to ixgbe(4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:38:53 -0000 On Sep 8, 2011, at 4:35 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 10:55 +0200, Vlad Galu wrote: >> On Sep 8, 2011, at 10:11 AM, Takuya ASADA wrote: >>> Hi, >>>=20 >>> 2011/9/5 Ben Hutchings : >>>> On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 15:51 +0900, Takuya ASADA wrote: >>>> [...] >>>>=20 >>>> Linux also has a generic interface to RX filtering and hashing >>>> (ethtool_rxnfc) which ixgbe supports; wouldn't it be better for = FreeBSD >>>> to support something like that? >>>>=20 >>>> Ben. >>>=20 >>> Linux implement it on ethtool command, what should we do? >>> Maybe a new option for ifconfig, or provide new command for it? >>=20 >> I for one would love to see this functionality built into ifconfig. >> Linux always seems to have one tool too many. There's ifconfig, >> iproute2, route, mii-tool and ethtool. >=20 > The current tools are iproute2 (replacing ifconfig and route) and > ethtool. mii-tool might still be useful for debugging a 10M or 100M > driver, but ethtool can display anything an administrator would be > interested in. >=20 > Now you could quite reasonably say that the improvements made in > iproute2 ought to have been done without creating a new command. But = it > is not true that all these different commands are required. >=20 > Ben. You're right, I didn't mean that, only that, sometimes, diversity isn't = necessarily a good thing.