Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:16:28 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org>, "Conrad J. Sabatier" <conrads@cox.net>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: device atpic to be deprecated? Message-ID: <20060329091628.GC39779@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20060329085117.GU80492@spc.org> References: <20060329020527.f8f087a4.conrads@cox.net> <20060329085117.GU80492@spc.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--TYecfFk8j8mZq+dy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 09:51:17AM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 02:05:27AM -0600, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > Is the plan still in effect to abolish this device? >=20 > To my mind it wouldn't make much sense, given the sheer amount of hardware > out there which doesn't have an IOAPIC, then again I'm probably out of > touch with the state of interrupt handling in -CURRENT. >=20 The 'atpic' is standard on i386, and optional on amd64: /sys/conf/files.i386:i386/isa/atpic.c standard /sys/conf/files.amd64:amd64/isa/atpic.c optional atpic isa Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --TYecfFk8j8mZq+dy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEKlBsqRfpzJluFF4RAkLdAJwLo2+zgCsgCjicmUWRfLR/gqG2oQCfVgrx bF+AjBVZQgLQNFYfmU6fn0w= =ufsc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TYecfFk8j8mZq+dy--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060329091628.GC39779>